🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 546+ reviews
Beauty✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Legs that won’t walk

★★★★★ 4.5 out of 5 (546 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
✓ complimentary fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

1- Acrylic card1- Team Lezhin ticket1- Black bunny postcard1 x pcAll items latest/never displayedAccepting offersPlease take these off my hands!

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping

↩️
elementary Returns

📋 Product Description

Legs that won’t walk

1- Acrylic card
1- Team Lezhin ticket
1- Black bunny postcard
1 x pc

whole items newly-released/never displayed

Accepting offers

Please take these off my hands!​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 867872

Category: Beauty > Skin Care > Feet

Original Price: $50 USD

Sale Price: $30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.5
★★★★★
Based on 4758 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · San Diego, CA
★★★★★
finest
The Legs that won’t walk looks normal in real use.
41 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Raleigh, NC

★★★★★
splendid value for money
It’s my first time buying this type of Legs that won’t walk. Pretty satisfied.
33 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson ✓ Verified Purchase​
4 months ago · Aurora, CO
★★★★☆
ideal for my needs
Bought this Legs that won’t walk as a gift and it was a huge hit! Highly endorse.
27 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis
11 months ago · San Jose, CA
★★★★☆
No complaints​
For the price, it does the job and it works for me. Works fine so far.
33 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Colorado Springs, CO
★★★★★
fancy this Legs that won’t walk!
The Legs that won’t walk is better than expected.
36 people found this helpful