🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 126+ reviews
Kidsβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Little sleepies bluey

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (126 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$50​
$83.33
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

2T shorts set purple and pink.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express dispatch
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Little sleepies bluey

2T shorts set purple and pink.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1849971

Category: Kids > Boys One-pieces > Boys 2T-5T

Original Price: $83.33 USD

Sale Price: $50 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1712 reviews
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly pleased
At first, the Little sleepies bluey does its job and I don’t regret it.
20 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
magnificent quality Little sleepies bluey! extremely satisfied with my purchase. Fast shipping too!
48 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional Little sleepies bluey!
Bought this Little sleepies bluey as a gift and it was a huge hit! Highly advise.
19 people found this helpful​
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
After a few days, the Little sleepies bluey works well enough so I’m okay with it. Arrived on time.
9 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase 
4 months ago Β· recent York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific Little sleepies bluey!
In daily use, the Little sleepies bluey works fine which is good enough.
48 people found this helpful