🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 711+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (711 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$66.17
$110.28
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

SteiffOkapi

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express dispatch
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage

Steiff
Okapi

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1913240

Category: Toys > Stuffed Animals & Plush > Stuffed Animals

Original Price: $110.28 USD

Sale Price: $66.17 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7202 reviews

JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
foremost purchase ever
To be fair, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is uncomplicated to use so no complaints.
41 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage
The Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage feels stable.
44 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
After a few days, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Packaging was basic.
9 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
highly pleased
Quality is decent for the price. Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is fine.
35 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
So far, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is straightforward to use which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful