🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 341+ reviews
Petβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8)

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (341 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11​
$18.33
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Brand latest pack of 8

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8)

Brand purely-arrived pack of 8

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Pet products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2441900

Category: Pet > Cat Supplies > Cat Litter

Original Price: $18.33 USD

Sale Price: $11 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5719 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly pleased
The Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8) arrived and functioned normally.
27 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Orlando, FL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Impressed!
truly pleased with this purchase Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8).
31 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
foremost decision
After a few days, the Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8) works well enough which is good enough. dispatch was normal.
37 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Really magnificent
After a few days, the Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8) does its job and it’s fine overall. Packaging was uncomplicated.
28 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell
4 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
solely what I wanted
From my experience, the Tidy Cats BREEZE Cat Pads (8) is practical so it’s acceptable. distribution was normal.
47 people found this helpful